Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These France Insoumise results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 5,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,906 of 37,536 keywords). This France Insoumise is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
France Insoumise
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%France Insoumise (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.1%37.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 50.1%50.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.7%23.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 50.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos