Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Forever War results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,598 hits . Analysis detected 22,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,894 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This Forever War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Forever War
Keyword details
Total words: 21,894
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst