Keyword summary
⁠26%4 analyzed articles/videos1,638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forests results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 3,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,573 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (28,026 of 34,833 keywords). This Forests is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Forests
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠20%Forests (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos