Keyword summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ford Transit Van results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 1,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,236 of 37,536 keywords). This Ford Transit Van is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Ford Transit Van
Keyword details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst