Keyword summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ford results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,823 hits . Analysis detected 23,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,645 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,436 of 37,536 keywords). This Ford is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Ford
Keyword details
Total words: 20,645
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst