Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Labels results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,390 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (32,267 of 35,675 keywords). This Food Labels is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Food Labels
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠10%Food Labels (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,390
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos