Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Benefits results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,891 hits . Analysis detected 11,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,460 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,675 of 34,544 keywords). This Food Benefits is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Food Benefits
Keyword details
Total words: 20,460
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst