Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fiscal Crisis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 3,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Fiscal Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fiscal Crisis
Keyword details
Total words: 1,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaningā¦ Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 47.5% 47.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.9% 40.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 47.5%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst