Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Films results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,240 hits. Analysis detected 17,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,428 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,727 of 37,536 keywords). This Films is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Films
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Films (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,428
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate