Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Harrell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 3,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,000 of 6,628 authors). This Phil Harrell is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Phil Harrell
Author details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.7% 11.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst