Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Grand Jury Decision results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 2,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ā 81% (7,114 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Grand Jury Decision is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Federal Grand Jury Decision
Keyword details
Total words: 1,816
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.0% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Politically Right Leaningā¦ Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst