Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Government Spending results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 5,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Government Spending is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Government Spending
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,693
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos