Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Falafel results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 1,190 hits. Analysis detected 6,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,348 of 37,321 keywords). This Falafel is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Falafel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
91%Falafel (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 26.4%26.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 36.4%36.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 24.4%24.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 36.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos