Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 2,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exxon Mobil results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,003 hits . Analysis detected 8,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,794 of 37,536 keywords). This Exxon Mobil is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Exxon Mobil
Keyword details
Total words: 7,161
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 28.0% 28.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst