Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evangelicals results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 2,107 hits . Analysis detected 16,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,441 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,360 of 34,858 keywords). This Evangelicals is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Evangelicals
Keyword details
Total words: 12,441
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst