Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etfs results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,352 hits . Analysis detected 11,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,936 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,694 of 37,536 keywords). This Etfs is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Etfs
Keyword details
Total words: 8,936
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst