Keyword summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ervan Chew Park results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 896 hits . Analysis detected 6,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,519 of 37,536 keywords). This Ervan Chew Park is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Ervan Chew Park
Keyword details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst