Keyword summary
44% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Review results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,597 hits . Analysis detected 8,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,105 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,959 of 35,635 keywords). This Environmental Review is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Environmental Review
Keyword details
Total words: 11,105
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst