Keyword summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Transition results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 822 hits . Analysis detected 8,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,914 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (28,925 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Transition is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Energy Transition
Keyword details
Total words: 9,914
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst