Keyword summary
39% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Security results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,543 hits . Analysis detected 14,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,361 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,247 of 35,444 keywords). This Energy Security is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Energy Security
Keyword details
Total words: 17,361
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst