Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Independence results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,348 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (20,967 of 36,607 keywords). This Energy Independence is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Energy Independence
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
43%Energy Independence (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,348
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate