Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Blunt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 1,459 hits . Analysis detected 5,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,456 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,417 of 37,536 keywords). This Emily Blunt is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Emily Blunt
Keyword details
Total words: 5,456
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.7% 26.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst