Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embargo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 1,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,362 of 37,533 keywords). This Embargo is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Embargo
Keyword details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst