Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carolyn Gramling results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 109 hits . Analysis detected 1,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,772 of 6,359 authors). This Carolyn Gramling is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Carolyn Gramling
Author details
Total words: 2,092
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst