Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elliott Abrams results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 284 hits . Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,660 of 36,716 keywords). This Elliott Abrams is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Elliott Abrams
Keyword details
Total words: 916
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles916 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.0% 31.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst