Keyword summary
53%3 analyzed articles/videos922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electronic Frontier Foundation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,141 hits. Analysis detected 7,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,549 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (17,360 of 35,635 keywords). This Electronic Frontier Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
52%Electronic Frontier Foundation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,549
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate