Keyword summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electric Bills results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 3,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,189 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,568 of 37,536 keywords). This Electric Bills is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Electric Bills
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
19%Electric Bills (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,189
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos