Keyword summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Assistance Commission. results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 645 hits . Analysis detected 5,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,549 of 35,649 keywords). This Election Assistance Commission. is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Election Assistance Commission.
Keyword details
Total words: 3,669
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst