Keyword summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Assistance Commission. results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 645 hits. Analysis detected 5,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,549 of 35,649 keywords). This Election Assistance Commission. is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Election Assistance Commission.
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Election Assistance Commission. (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate