Keyword summary
55% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Forbes results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,073 hits . Analysis detected 6,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,981 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (28,345 of 35,404 keywords). This Elaine Forbes is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Elaine Forbes
Keyword details
Total words: 9,981
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 65% 7/22/2026, 10:24:01 PM
KTVU 65% 7/21/2026, 12:52:02 AM