Keyword summary
72% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Coercion results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,519 hits . Analysis detected 18,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,914 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,156 of 35,223 keywords). This Economic Coercion is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Economic Coercion
Keyword details
Total words: 17,914
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst