Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebrahim Zolfaghari results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 2,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (25,642 of 37,536 keywords). This Ebrahim Zolfaghari is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Ebrahim Zolfaghari
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠32%Ebrahim Zolfaghari (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos