Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eaton Fire results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,875 hits . Analysis detected 14,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,979 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,858 of 36,915 keywords). This Eaton Fire is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Eaton Fire
Keyword details
Total words: 12,979
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst