Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Times staff results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 823 hits . Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,047 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,784 of 6,628 authors). This Times staff is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Times staff
Author details
Total words: 4,047
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.8% 14.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.5% 8.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst