Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These District 4 Labs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 3,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,552 of 37,536 keywords). This District 4 Labs is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
District 4 Labs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠96%District 4 Labs (selected)12%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510095.9% percentile
11.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 29.3%29.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 23.8%23.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 17.7%17.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos