Keyword summary
86% 3 analyzed articles/videos 272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dionne Foster results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 892 hits . Analysis detected 4,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,148 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,923 of 37,536 keywords). This Dionne Foster is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Dionne Foster
Keyword details
Total words: 5,148
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst