Keyword summary
33% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dinosaurs results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,750 hits . Analysis detected 14,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,603 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,643 of 37,536 keywords). This Dinosaurs is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Dinosaurs
Keyword details
Total words: 15,603
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst