Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Detroit Tigers results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Detroit Tigers is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Detroit Tigers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst