Keyword summary
ā 0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit Lions results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 2,144 hits . Analysis detected 15,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,511 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ā 75% (9,711 of 37,536 keywords). This Detroit Lions is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Detroit Lions
Keyword details
Total words: 9,511
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 20.7% 20.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.5% 22.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst