Keyword summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit History results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 94 hits . Analysis detected 560 faulty-reasoning hits from 705 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,268 of 37,530 keywords). This Detroit History is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Detroit History
Keyword details
Total words: 705
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles705 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst