Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Destroyed Buildings results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,372 of 37,536 keywords). This Destroyed Buildings is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Destroyed Buildings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Destroyed Buildings (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos