Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Del Mar Fairgrounds results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 2,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Del Mar Fairgrounds is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Del Mar Fairgrounds
Keyword details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst