Keyword summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deion Sanders results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 380 hits . Analysis detected 2,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,760 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (54,711 of 55,943 keywords). This Deion Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Deion Sanders
Keyword details
Total words: 9,760
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst