Keyword summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video1,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dehumanizing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 3,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (29,489 of 37,536 keywords). This Dehumanizing is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Dehumanizing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠22%Dehumanizing (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,964
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos