Keyword summary
77%1 analyzed article/video454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Secretary results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,258 of 36,939 keywords). This Defense Secretary is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Defense Secretary
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
84%Defense Secretary (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos