Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debates results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,549 hits . Analysis detected 13,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,800 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,272 of 37,536 keywords). This Debates is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Debates
Keyword details
Total words: 17,800
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst