Keyword summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These De Escalation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,974 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (10,602 of 37,536 keywords). This De Escalation is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
De Escalation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠72%De Escalation (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,974
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos