Keyword summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Street Station results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,921 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,503 of 37,536 keywords). This David Street Station is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. David Street Station
Keyword details
Total words: 3,921
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst