Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 7,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Attenborough results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 3,480 hits . Analysis detected 14,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,643 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (23,340 of 36,451 keywords). This David Attenborough is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. David Attenborough
Keyword details
Total words: 15,643
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst