Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatima Al-Kassab results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 880 hits . Analysis detected 2,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,427 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,177 of 6,628 authors). This Fatima Al-Kassab is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Fatima Al-Kassab
Author details
Total words: 2,427
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 36.3% 36.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 36.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst