Keyword summary
12% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darline Graham results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 638 hits . Analysis detected 5,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,398 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,805 of 37,536 keywords). This Darline Graham is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Darline Graham
Keyword details
Total words: 9,398
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst